//
you're reading...
Analyses and Commentaries

International law and sovereignty over the Paracel and Spratly archipelagos (Part 4)

South China Sea

Part 4: Vague and imprecise “archaeological evidence” of China

With a view to strengthening arguments about its sovereignty over Hoàng Sa (Paracels) and Trường Sa (Spratlys) archipelagoes, China has resorted to archaeological grounds. China claims to have found traces of ancient coins and tools from the era of Wang Mang (the third year BC until the 23rd year AD) on the islands.

Chang Teh-Kuang and S. Yeh wrote that the islands contained “ruins of living quarters, pottery and porcelain utensils, iron knives, iron cooking pots and other articles of daily use belonging to the Tang and Song dynasties.” The preliminary report of the second archaeological survey on the Xisha islands of Guangdong province recorded that “through the two surveys, the archaeologists have examined most of the islands, rocks, submerged cays and pools of the Xisha archipelago and, virtually everywhere, they found ancient objects and historical relics of the Xisha archipelago…

View original post 940 more words

Advertisements

Discussion

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow South China Sea Research on WordPress.com

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 139 other followers

%d bloggers like this: