//
you're reading...
U-Shaped Line and Maritime Delimitation

The Effect of Historic Fishing Rights In Maritime Boundaries Delimitation

South China Sea

The Effect of Historic Fishing Rights In Maritime Boundaries Delimitation

Leonardo Bernard
Research Fellow, Centre for International Law
National University of Singapore

I. Introduction

When the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) regime was established by the Third United Nations Conference of the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS III) it created a new fisheries regime for coastal States. The EEZ regime under Part V of the 1982 United Nations Convention of the Law of the Sea (LOS Convention) grants coastal States exclusive rights to fisheries resources as far as 200 nautical miles (nm) from their coastlines. It has been commonly asserted that the EEZ regime, which is now widely accepted as customary international law, precludes States from making claims to traditional or historic fishing rights in the EEZ of other States. Some States, however, have continued to assert historic fishing rights within the EEZ of other States, the most prominent example being…

View original post 136 more words

Advertisements

Discussion

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow South China Sea Research on WordPress.com

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 141 other followers

%d bloggers like this: